Oral Answers to Questions | Deputy Prime Minister: House of Lords Reform

Posted on: 7th July 2011

Scroll forward to 2mins 58 seconds to see Andrew’s question.

Andrew George (St Ives, Liberal Democrat)

Given that in our debates so far no one has rushed to the defence of the hereditary principle or patronage, does my right hon. Friend not agree that if we are to make haste in delivering the principles behind Lords reform, it would be best to get on with removing the hereditary principle and patronage now? No one disagrees with that.

Nicholas Clegg (Deputy Prime Minister, Lord President of the Council; Sheffield, Hallam, Liberal Democrat)

I certainly agree that we aspire to create a reform that, although evolutionary in its implementation—it will take several years rather than happen overnight—will at least be comprehensive and create a reformed House of Lords with a far greater mandate and democratic legitimacy than is currently the case.

 

Later in the same debate

Andrew George (St Ives, Liberal Democrat)

What assessment he has made of the recent debates in both Houses on his proposals for House of Lords reform.

Nicholas Clegg (Deputy Prime Minister, Lord President of the Council; Sheffield, Hallam, Liberal Democrat)

The Government have received many representations on all aspects of House of Lords reform, including from constitutional experts. We recognise that a variety of views were expressed in recent debates in both Houses, and we are sure that the Joint Committee will take account of the debates when scrutinising the draft Bill and White Paper.

See the whole debate HERE

join our mailing list
* indicates required